rabbit polyclonal anti trpc6 (Proteintech)
Structured Review

Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Trpc6, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 41 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal anti trpc6/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 41 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "The calcium channel TRPC6 promotes chemotherapy-induced persistence by regulating integrin α6 mRNA splicing"
Article Title: The calcium channel TRPC6 promotes chemotherapy-induced persistence by regulating integrin α6 mRNA splicing
Journal: Cell reports
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113347
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Heatmap of differentially expressed genes in the CSC and non-CSC populations from a published model system. TRPC6 is highlighted in the heatmap. False discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and |log2FC| (fold change) > 1. (B) Expression of TRPC6 and other calcium channels was compared in the same CSC vs. non-CSC populations by qPCR. (C) TRPC6 expression was compared in MDA-MB-231 cells and their TE3 variants. (D) HMLER cells were sorted into CD104 − /CD24 − (CSC; HMLER −/− ) and CD104 + /CD24 + (non-CSC; HMLER +/+ ) populations, and TRPC6 expression was quantified by qPCR. (E) The CSC (CD44 high /CD24 low ) and non-CSC (CD44 low /CD24 high ) populations was sorted from a TNBC PDX (left), and TRPC6 expression levels measured were quantified by qPCR. (F and G) TRPC6 expression was knocked down in either TE3 (F) or CAL-51 (G) cells using shRNA, and expression was rescued with either a wild-type TRPC6 construct (WT) or a pore mutant (G757D) that is deficient in calcium uptake (MUT). These populations were assessed for self-renewal by serial passage of mammospheres (P1, passage 1; P2, passage 2). (H) CAL-51 control shRNA (shCTRL) or TRPC6 knockdown (shTRPC6) cells were injected into the mammary fat pads of NSG mice in limiting dilution (10 6 , 10 5 , and 10 4 cells), and the frequency of tumor incidence was determined (right). Tumor incidence was plotted utilizing ELDA in a log plot to estimate the frequency of tumor-initiating cells in each group. (I) CAL-51 cells (shCTRL, shTRPC6–1, sh+ WT TRPC6, and sh+ mut TRPC6) were injected into the mammary fat pads of NSG mice, and tumor onset in terms of days post-injection was compared among the groups. The TRPC6 expression data shown in (C) and (D) represent the mean ± SD of a representative experiment performed three times independently. The mammosphere data shown represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. For (H), data are presented as log-log plot, and the frequency of tumor-initiating cells is calculated by extreme limiting-dilution analysis. The tumor onset data represent the median days post-injection between the groups. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Expressing, shRNA, Construct, Mutagenesis, Injection
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Characterization of CAL-51 chemotherapy-resistant cells. CAL-51 cells were made resistant to paclitaxel as described in the and then compared to parental cells (termed sensitive) for viability in response to increasing concentrations of paclitaxel. (B) TRPC6 mRNA expression was quantified in CAL-51-sensitive and -resistant cells. (C) CAL-51-sensitive and -resistant cells were assayed for the frequency of CSCs using a limiting-dilution mammosphere assay, and the data were analyzed by ELDA. (D) CAL-51-resistant cells were treated with vehicle control or BI-749327 (10 μM) for 24 h, and the frequency of CSCs was determined using a limiting-dilution mammosphere assay and ELDA. (E) CAL-51-resistant (CAL-51-R) cells were treated with increasing concentrations of paclitaxel in combination with either DMSO or BI-749327 (10 μM) for 24 h, and cell viability was assessed. (F) TRPC6 mRNA expression was quantified in chemotherapy-sensitive and -resistant models of a patient-derived organoid (9883T) as described in the . (G) The organoid models described in (F) were treated with either DMSO, paclitaxel (PTX; 20 nM), BI-749437 (10 μM), or PTX+BI-749327 (BI) for 96 h, and cell viability was measured. (H) Tumors volumes (in mm 3 ) in mice that had been implanted orthotopically with a human TNBC PDX (PDX HCI028). The mice were divided into 4 groups of 5 mice each. When tumors reached an approximate volume of 100 m 3 , the mice were treated with either vehicle, PTX (15 mg/kg), BI (15mg/kg), or a combination of PTX and BI. PTX was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) twice a week, and BI was administered by oral gavage 4 days a week. Day 0 on the x axis indicates the start of the treatments. Tumor volume was measured every 5 days. For (C) and (D), data are presented as a log-log plot, and the frequency of stem cells is calculated by extreme limiting-dilution analysis. The viability data shown (E and G) represent the mean ± SD of a representative experiment performed three times independently. The tumor volume data shown in (H) are represented as mean ± SEM of the number of mice in the respective groups. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Derivative Assay, Injection
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Heatmap showing genes that are differentially expressed in vehicle- and BI (10 μM)-treated TE3 cells (12 h). FDR < 0.05 and |log2FC| > 1. (B and C) ESRP1 mRNA (B) and protein (C) expression was assessed in TE3 cells treated with either vehicle control or BI (10 μM) for 24 h. (D) TE3 and CAL-51 cells were treated with either vehicle control or BI (10 μM) for 24 h, and the expression of the α6A and α6B integrin splice variants was assessed by immunoblotting. (E) The expression of TRPC6, ESRP1, α6A, and α6B was assessed in the CAL-51-sensitive and CAL-51-R cells by immunoblotting. (F) The expression of ESRP1, α6A, and α6B in CAL-51-R cells that had been treated with either DMSO or BI (10 μM) for 24 h was assessed by immunoblotting. (G) CAL-51-R cells were stably transfected with either a control plasmid (vector) or an ESRP1 expression plasmid (ESRP1-HA), and the expression of ESRP1, HA, and α6B was assessed by immunoblotting. (H) The same cells as in (G) were assayed for their sensitivity to increasing concentrations of PTX. (I) Parental CAL-51 cells that had been depleted of α6 integrin using CRISPR were stably transfected with either α6A or α6B plasmids. Cell viability in response to increasing concentrations of PTX was measured. The TRPC6 expression data shown in (B) represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Stable Transfection, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, CRISPR
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Myc mRNA expression was quantified by qPCR in CAL-51-sensitive (CAL-51-S) and CAL-51-R cells. (B) TRPC6 expression (log2fold) was analyzed from a published dataset of chemoresistant (doxorubicin) organoid models that were derived from patient tumors or cell lines (see Dupont et al. ). (C and D) Myc mRNA expression was quantified in TE3 (C) or CAL-51 (D) cells that had been stably transfected with either a control (shCTRL) or TRPC6 shRNAs (shTRPC6–1, shTRPC6–2). (E) TE3 cells were treated with either DMSO or BI (10 μM) for 24 h. Myc mRNA expression was quantified by qPCR in TE3 cells. (F) Myc protein expression by immunoblotting was detected in TE3 cells treated with either vehicle or 10 μM BI for 24 h. Freshly harvested PDX tumors that had been treated with either vehicle or BI (see ) were used to extract protein and RNA. Protein lysates were immunoblotted with a Myc antibody. Densitometric values are shown below the immunoblot. (G) CAL-51-R cells were transfected with either vector alone or a Myc expression vector, and their sensitivity to increasing concentrations of PTX was assessed by quantifying cell viability (left). Immunoblot showing Myc protein levels in CAL-51-R cells transfected with either an empty vector or Myc overexpression plasmid (right). (H) CAL-51 parental cells that has been pretreated with either DMSO or 10074-G5 (50 μM) for 24 h were assessed for their sensitivity to increasing concentrations of PTX, either alone or in combination with 1007-G5 (50 μM) for an additional 24 h. (I) Expression of the Myc target gene CDC25A was quantified by qPCR in CAL-51 cells treated with either DMSO or 10074-G5 (50 μM). The Myc expression levels in (A), (C), (D), and (E) represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Derivative Assay, Stable Transfection, Transfection, Western Blot, Plasmid Preparation, Over Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) SETD4 mRNA expression was quantified in CAL-51 cells that had been stably transfected with either a control (shCTRL) or TRPC6 shRNAs (shTRPC6–1,shTRPC6–2). (B) SETD4 mRNA expression was quantified in a TNBC PDX that had been treated with either vehicle or BI. (C) CAL-51 cells expressing a p27-mVenus reporter were treated with either vehicle or BI for 24 h. Cells were detached and processed for flow cytometry (mean fluorescence indicated by the number on the top left). Bar graph plotted using mean fluorescence intensity is shown on the right. (D) Comparison of TRPC6, SETD4, and ESRP1 mRNA expression between the CAL-51 p27 high and p27 low populations. (E) The p27 high population of CAL-51 cells was treated with either vehicle or BI for 24 h, and their ability to form mammospheres was assessed. (F) HCC-1806 cells expressing the p27-mVenus reporter were treated with either vehicle or BI for 24 h and processed for flow cytometry. Bar graph of mean fluorescence intensity is shown on the right. (G) HCC-1806 cells were transfected with a p27-mVenus reporter and sorted into p27 high and p27 low populations. The expression of TRPC6, SETD4, and ESRP1 mRNAs was compared between these populations. (H) Mammosphere formation was assayed in the p27 high population of HCC-1806 cells that had been treated with either DMSO or BI (10 μM). (I) The sensitivity of the p27 high and p27 low populations of CAL-51 to increasing concentrations of PTX was assessed. The SETD4 expression data shown represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Stable Transfection, Transfection, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: (A and B) Either TE3 (A) or CAL-51 (B) TRPC6 knockdown cells (shTRPC6–1, shTRPC6–2) were retransfected with an α6B expression plasmid (α6B-GFP) followed by knockdown of the endogenous α6 integrin (shITGA6). Myc mRNA expression was quantified by qPCR. (C) Myc expression in the non-CSC and CSC populations described in . (D) TE3 cells that had been stably transfected with either a control (shCTRL) or TRPC6 shRNAs (shTRPC6–1, shTRPC6–2) were retransfected with an α6B expression plasmid (α6B-GFP) followed by knockdown of the endogenous α6 integrin (shITGA6). Expression of ESRP1, CTGF, and ANKRD1 mRNAs was quantified by qPCR. (E and F) Myc mRNA expression was quantified in TE3 (E) and CAL-51 (F) cells that had been transfected with siCTRL or siRNA targeting TAZ (siTAZ). (G) Myc mRNA expression was quantified in CAL-51 cells transfected with either shCTRL or TRPC6 shRNAs (shTRPC6–1, shTRPC6–2) that were re-transfected with a constitutively active TAZ-4SA plasmid (4SA). The Myc expression data shown in (A), (B), (E), and (F) represent the mean ± SD of two independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Stable Transfection, Transfection
Figure Legend Snippet: This schematic depicts the key findings in this study. Treatment of a heterogeneous tumor with chemotherapy results in the survival of persister cells that are resistant to chemotherapy. These cells have high TRPC6 expression levels and stem cell properties. TRPC6 sustains the expression of α6B in this population through suppression of the splicing factor ESRP1. Enrichment of α6B in this population drives chemoresistance through a TAZ-mediated MYC suppression. This suppression of Myc maintains these cells in a quiescent state to survive chemotherapeutic stress.
Techniques Used: Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet:
Techniques Used: Virus, Derivative Assay, Recombinant, Mutagenesis, Bacteria, Sequencing, CRISPR, Plasmid Preparation, Software


